The best AI automation for Australian manufacturers

AI automation for a manufacturer is software that does the office admin around documents, emails and orders. It is not robots on the factory floor. On a 70-point test of running without an engineer, paperwork, systems fit, speed, price and proof, AI Advancements scores highest at 59, ahead of Salesforce Agentforce on 55 and Hourglass AI on 54.

The best AI automation for manufacturers in Australia, ranked

How each one scores

Points by test, scored 1 October 2026

Points for 8 options on 7 tests, with the total out of 70.

AI Advancements	Salesforce Agentforce	Hourglass AI	4mation	IFS	Tacton	Complexica	Canon
Runs without an engineer10 points
10 of 10	10 of 10	10 of 10	10 of 10	7 of 10	7 of 10	7 of 10	10 of 10
Paper and documents10 points
10 of 10	5 of 10	7 of 10	8 of 10	5 of 10	5 of 10	0 of 10	7 of 10
Export and compliance paperwork10 points
5 of 10	0 of 10	0 of 10	5 of 10	5 of 10	0 of 10	0 of 10	5 of 10
Works with your systems10 points
10 of 10	10 of 10	10 of 10	7 of 10	3 of 10	7 of 10	3 of 10	6 of 10
Time to first build10 points
10 of 10	10 of 10	10 of 10	10 of 10	6 of 10	6 of 10	10 of 10	0 of 10
Published price10 points
4 of 10	10 of 10	10 of 10	7 of 10	0 of 10	0 of 10	0 of 10	0 of 10
Manufacturing proof10 points
10 of 10	10 of 10	7 of 10	6 of 10	8 of 10	8 of 10	10 of 10	2 of 10
Total scoreout of 70
59 of 701st	55 of 702nd	54 of 703rd	53 of 704th	34 of 705th	33 of 706th	30 of 707th	30 of 708th

1. AI Advancements

Rank 1

AI Advancements

Best for

Resources, energy and regulated businesses in Western Australia that want AI engineers embedded in their team

Location

Osborne Park, Perth

Runs without an engineer10/10

Paper and documents10/10

Export and compliance paperwork5/10

Works with your systems10/10

Time to first build10/10

Published price4/10

Manufacturing proof10/10

Total score59/70

AI Advancements embeds its own AI engineers directly in a client's team. Its compliance assistant for 3Lines reads handwritten notes and scanned documents, which turned an 8-hour, $1,600 document job into a 10-minute, $5 one. It also checks every Statement of Advice against the Corporations Act.

One Fortescue automation saves about three hours a day. Amplitude Energy's finance team got a week back every month from an agent that ties every balance back to SAP. A report-writing build for Bellarine Psychology was delivered in two days. Development starts with a paid $2,000 scoping engagement, credited to the build.

• Beats the field on: paper and documents, 10/10, the only full marks on this list. It also has full marks on running without an engineer, works with your systems, time to first build and manufacturing proof.
• Loses on: published price, 4. It publishes only the scoping fee, not a build or ongoing price.

2. Salesforce Agentforce

Rank 2

Salesforce Agentforce

Best for

Manufacturers and distributors already on Salesforce that want AI agents on the same platform

Runs without an engineer10/10

Paper and documents5/10

Export and compliance paperwork0/10

Works with your systems10/10

Time to first build10/10

Published price10/10

Manufacturing proof10/10

Total score55/70

Salesforce's Starter Suite starts at AU$35 per user a month with email integration for Gmail or Outlook. Agentforce 1 editions start at $550 per user a month, and agent actions are billed per Flex Credit. MuleSoft connects Legend Corporation's SAP to Salesforce, and Document AI reads information locked in PDFs and images so agents can act on it.

Team Global Express resolves 50% of common enquiries with Agentforce. Fisher & Paykel lifted appliance support self-service from 40% to 70%, and reMarkable deployed its first AI agent in three weeks.

• Beats the field on: none outright. It has full marks on five tests, level with AI Advancements for the most on this list.
• Loses on: export and compliance paperwork, 0. The pages read describe no compliance or export paperwork handling.

3. Hourglass AI

Rank 3

Hourglass AI

Best for

Australian manufacturers and regional operators of 10 to 100 people with no engineer on staff

Location

Sydney and Melbourne

Runs without an engineer10/10

Paper and documents7/10

Export and compliance paperwork0/10

Works with your systems10/10

Time to first build10/10

Published price10/10

Manufacturing proof7/10

Total score54/70

Hourglass AI builds and maintains the AI for Australian companies of 10 to 100 people, so the business needs no engineer of its own. When models change or things break, that is Hourglass' job.

Its Company AI Brain joins the files, email, CRM and finance systems a business already runs, including Xero, into one knowledge layer. That layer sits above those systems rather than replacing them. Co-founder Michael Batko told AI Down Under that what Hourglass builds always sits on the client's own infrastructure. Its largest client brain holds 71,000 files, and clients typically find information 60 to 80% faster within 30 days.

On that foundation it builds agents for the back office: order processing, scheduling and route planning, invoice chasing and reconciliation checks. Its AI Inbox reads and sorts every email in Gmail or Microsoft 365 overnight. A first build is live in one to two weeks, at $5,000 to $25,000, with maintenance at about $1,000 a month.

A forestry and timber business cut its board reporting from two days to about 20 minutes. In Tasmania, a timber manufacturer signed five builds, one of which replaces a $30,000-a-month vendor. A meat processor found the website, did an audit and started a build in under three weeks. Schweigen's own review says the chatbot Finlay Ekins led for it was delivered in under two months.

By June 2026 Hourglass AI had worked with 35 companies. Batko backed 228 companies with first cheques during his time running Startmate.

• Strongest on: runs without an engineer, works with your systems, time to first build and published price. It has full marks on all four, 40 of 40 points, and is one of two entries with full marks on published price.

4. 4mation

Rank 4

4mation

Best for

Manufacturers and transport businesses that want AI inside a larger custom-software build

Location

Sydney

Runs without an engineer10/10

Paper and documents8/10

Export and compliance paperwork5/10

Works with your systems7/10

Time to first build10/10

Published price7/10

Manufacturing proof6/10

Total score53/70

4mation builds site, dispatch and warehouse software that integrates with Xero, MYOB, TechnologyOne and SAP, with compliance engines that keep WHS, OHS and quality assurance records audit-ready. For transport clients it replaces paper proofs of delivery, and SG Fleet's rebuilt quote calculator produced a 500% increase in quotes.

Its chatbot for Ego Pharmaceuticals' QV IQ handled 684 chats in its first month. The Premium AI consulting package builds an AI assistant in an engagement of up to one month for $10,000 plus GST, and chatbot packages are $20,000 and $40,000 ex GST.

• Beats the field on: none outright. Paper and documents, 8, is second only to AI Advancements.
• Loses on: manufacturing proof, 6, and works with your systems, 7. The pages read name no email system or Microsoft 365.

5. IFS

Rank 5

IFS

Best for

Mid-size and large manufacturers replacing their ERP, production and asset systems with one platform

Runs without an engineer7/10

Paper and documents5/10

Export and compliance paperwork5/10

Works with your systems3/10

Time to first build6/10

Published price0/10

Manufacturing proof8/10

Total score34/70

IFS brings ERP, MES, EAM, supply chain and industrial AI together on one platform, with compliance and end-to-end traceability for regulated manufacturing. It captures supplier invoice data from emails, PDFs and images with OCR and AI.

Miele's Australian and New Zealand rollout went live within nine months for about 200 field technicians and contact centre agents. Cheer Pack North America anticipates $1.5 million a year in savings from IFS.ai running the autonomous vehicles on its shop floor.

• Beats the field on: none outright. Export and compliance paperwork, 5, is level with the highest on this list.
• Loses on: published price, 0, and works with your systems, 3. It replaces the ERP rather than working with the one you run.

6. Tacton

Rank 6

Tacton

Best for

Makers of complex, configurable products that need quoting connected to SAP or Dynamics

Runs without an engineer7/10

Paper and documents5/10

Export and compliance paperwork0/10

Works with your systems7/10

Time to first build6/10

Published price0/10

Manufacturing proof8/10

Total score33/70

Tacton is configure, price and quote software built only for manufacturers of complex products, and it integrates with SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Oracle. Alimak cut its product-modelling time by up to 80%, and Spectrum Industries raised its quote efficiency by 50%. IMI took about a year from contract to first launch and has since grown from twelve product lines to about fifty.

• Beats the field on: none outright. Manufacturing proof, 8, is level with IFS.
• Loses on: export and compliance paperwork and published price, 0 each. Quoting is its whole job.

7. Complexica

Rank 7

Complexica

Best for

Large food, beverage and industrial distributors that need demand planning, pricing and scheduling optimisation

Location

Adelaide

Runs without an engineer7/10

Paper and documents0/10

Export and compliance paperwork0/10

Works with your systems3/10

Time to first build10/10

Published price0/10

Manufacturing proof10/10

Total score30/70

Complexica is an Adelaide software company whose Decision Cloud covers demand planning, integrated scheduling and ports, rail and road logistics. It names PFD Food Services and Asahi Beverages as clients, DuluxGroup and Polyaire on its company page, and quotes Pernod Ricard Winemakers' global operations director on its logistics page. Its order management page says a basic single-location system can be ready in as little as two weeks.

• Beats the field on: none outright. Manufacturing proof, 10, is level with AI Advancements and Salesforce Agentforce.
• Loses on: paper and documents and published price, 0 each. Neither appears on the pages read.

8. Canon

Rank 8

Canon

Best for

Businesses with rooms of paper that need scanning, data capture and managed document services

Runs without an engineer10/10

Paper and documents7/10

Export and compliance paperwork5/10

Works with your systems6/10

Time to first build0/10

Published price0/10

Manufacturing proof2/10

Total score30/70

Canon's intelligent document and data capture software takes manual data entry off staff and captures email through native Microsoft Office integrations. Its process automation handles compliance, audit and legislative requirements for records, and InComPro cut its annual NDIS audit from three weeks of manual work to minutes. Goldengrove Building Group used it to lift its invoice processing capacity.

• Beats the field on: none outright. Runs without an engineer, 10, is level with the top four.
• Loses on: time to first build and published price, 0 each. Neither appears on the pages read.

How they compare

The first table answers five questions a regional operator asks on the first call, from each entry's own pages, documentation and customer stories. The second shows what each one charges. Four of the eight publish a price. Four say they capture data from paper or scanned documents.

8 options, side by side

Checked 1 October 2026

QuestionAI AdvancementsSalesforce AgentforceHourglass AI4mationIFSTactonComplexicaCanon

Builds and runs it for you?Its own site says it builds, implements or manages the system for the clientAI Advancements: Yes.Salesforce Agentforce: Not stated.Hourglass AI: Yes.4mation: Yes.IFS: Yes.Tacton: Yes.Complexica: Yes.Canon: Yes.

Builds and runs it for you? Each option's answer, from its own pages.

Option	Answer
AI Advancements	Yes. Embeds its own AI engineers in the client's team.
Salesforce Agentforce	Not stated. Sells the platform, with professional services and implementation partners.
Hourglass AI	Yes. Builds the brain and the agents, and maintains them: when models change or things break, that is its job.
4mation	Yes. Builds the software and supports it through its Service Desk.
IFS	Yes. Scopes and runs the implementation project, then supports the software.
Tacton	Yes. Offers implementation services and support plans for its software.
Complexica	Yes. Deploys its Decision Cloud software for clients.
Canon	Yes. Runs managed document services.

Captures paper and scanned documents?Its own site says it captures data from paper or scanned documentsAI Advancements: Yes.Salesforce Agentforce: Yes.Hourglass AI: Not stated.4mation: Not stated.IFS: Yes.Tacton: Not stated.Complexica: Not stated.Canon: Yes.

Captures paper and scanned documents? Each option's answer, from its own pages.

Option	Answer
AI Advancements	Yes. Its compliance assistant reads handwritten notes and scanned documents.
Salesforce Agentforce	Yes. Document AI pulls data out of scanned PDFs and images for its agents.
Hourglass AI	Not stated. Reads documents, email and files into its company brain. Paper and scans are not mentioned.
4mation	Not stated. Names OCR among its AI techniques and digitises paper proofs of delivery, without saying it captures data from scans.
IFS	Yes. Captures supplier invoice data from PDFs and images with OCR and AI.
Tacton	Not stated. Turns product rules and documentation into models. Paper and scans are not mentioned.
Complexica	Not stated. The pages read do not mention paper or scans.
Canon	Yes. Its document and data capture software replaces manual data entry, and Hallmark Homes scanned and archived its paperwork with it.

Works inside your ERP or accounting system?Its own site names an ERP or accounting system it works withAI Advancements: Yes.Salesforce Agentforce: Yes.Hourglass AI: Yes.4mation: Yes.IFS: No.Tacton: Yes.Complexica: Not stated.Canon: Not stated.

Works inside your ERP or accounting system? Each option's answer, from its own pages.

Option	Answer
AI Advancements	Yes. Its Amplitude Energy agent ties every balance back to SAP.
Salesforce Agentforce	Yes. MuleSoft connects Legend Corporation's SAP to Salesforce.
Hourglass AI	Yes. Its brain ingests from Xero, QuickBooks, HubSpot and Salesforce and sits above them rather than replacing them.
4mation	Yes. Integrates with Xero, MYOB, TechnologyOne and SAP.
IFS	No. IFS is the ERP: it brings ERP, MES, EAM and supply chain onto one platform, replacing rather than joining the systems you run.
Tacton	Yes. Integrates with SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Oracle.
Complexica	Not stated. Publishes integration APIs for common ERP systems, without naming one.
Canon	Not stated. Feeds captured invoice data into a client's financial system, without naming one.

Publishes a time to first build?A stated time from start to a working first buildAI Advancements: Yes.Salesforce Agentforce: Yes.Hourglass AI: Yes.4mation: Yes.IFS: Yes.Tacton: Yes.Complexica: Yes.Canon: No.

Publishes a time to first build? Each option's answer, from its own pages.

Option	Answer
AI Advancements	Yes. Its Bellarine Psychology build was delivered in two days.
Salesforce Agentforce	Yes. reMarkable deployed its first AI agent in three weeks.
Hourglass AI	Yes. A first build is live in one to two weeks.
4mation	Yes. Its Premium package includes building an AI assistant in an engagement of up to one month.
IFS	Yes. Miele's Australian and New Zealand implementations went live within nine months.
Tacton	Yes. IMI went from contract to first launch in about a year.
Complexica	Yes. A basic single-location order management system can be ready in as little as two weeks, a complex one in several months.
Canon	No. No time appears on the pages read.

Names a manufacturing or logistics client with a result?A named manufacturing, food, resources or logistics client with a figure, on its own siteAI Advancements: Yes.Salesforce Agentforce: Yes.Hourglass AI: Not stated.4mation: Yes.IFS: Yes.Tacton: Yes.Complexica: Not stated.Canon: No.

Names a manufacturing or logistics client with a result? Each option's answer, from its own pages.

Option	Answer
AI Advancements	Yes. One Fortescue automation saves about three hours a day.
Salesforce Agentforce	Yes. Team Global Express resolves 50% of common enquiries with Agentforce.
Hourglass AI	Not stated. Its manufacturing results are anonymised: a forestry and timber business cut board reporting from two days to about 20 minutes. Schweigen, a named manufacturer, says its chatbot was delivered in under two months.
4mation	Yes. Ego Pharmaceuticals' QV IQ chatbot handled 684 chats in its first month.
IFS	Yes. Cheer Pack North America anticipates $1.5 million a year in savings from IFS.ai.
Tacton	Yes. Alimak cut CPQ product-modelling time by up to 80%.
Complexica	Not stated. Names PFD Food Services, Asahi Beverages, DuluxGroup and Pernod Ricard Winemakers as clients, without figures.
Canon	No. Its named results are a home builder and an NDIS provider. Its supermarket result, 2 million invoices a year automated, is anonymised.

Yes answersOut of 5 questions5 yes for AI Advancements4 yes for Salesforce Agentforce3 yes for Hourglass AI4 yes for 4mation4 yes for IFS4 yes for Tacton2 yes for Complexica2 yes for Canon

What AI automation costs a manufacturer

Published prices, AUD

What AI automation costs a manufacturer, by option: Entry or audit, Typical build or licence, Ongoing.

Option	Entry or audit	Typical build or licence	Ongoing
AI Advancements	$2,000Paid scoping, credited to the build	Not published	Not published
Salesforce Agentforce	From AU$35 a monthPer user, Starter Suite	From $550 a monthPer user, Agentforce 1 editions	Per Flex CreditAgent actions billed by usage
Hourglass AI	Flat feeAI Audit, credited to a build started within 30 days	$5,000 to $25,000Each build, live in 1 to 2 weeks	About $1,000 a monthPer build
4mation	$6,000 to $12,000AI consulting packages, plus GST	$20,000 or $40,000Chatbot packages, ex GST	Not publishedService Desk support, unpriced
IFS	Not published	Not published	Not published
Tacton	Not published	Not published	Not published
Complexica	Not published	Not published	Not published
Canon	Not published	Not published	Not published

Which option fits your business

• Pick a do-it-yourself setup with Claude or ChatGPT on a work account if you have fewer than about 10 people and one repetitive job to fix.

What to check before you hire or buy one

This page is written for a regional manufacturer or distributor of 10 to 100 people with no engineer on staff. That business is under-served. More than half of Australian SMEs are yet to meaningfully adopt AI, and services firms lead industrials in AI uptake because their barriers to entry are lower. These plants have hard problems, such as routing trucks the shortest distance and packing containers to the millimetre. They were never going to hire the people who could solve them in software.

So the tests here are about the office, not the factory floor. In Australia, Google's AI answer for "ai in manufacturing" leads with predictive maintenance, computer vision and cobots. Those need sensor data and engineers to run them. A plant with no engineer gets its first return from the paperwork, the inbox, the reports and the routes. That is administrative, clerical and routine finance work, which the Reserve Bank's survey of firms lists among the roles AI is most likely to change.

Who keeps it running?

In a business of 10 to 100 people without an engineering team, the question that matters is who fixes the system when a model changes or a supplier sends a new form. Five entries score full marks on running without an engineer. The other three score 7: they build or implement the system and support it after launch, but the pages read do not name small or mid-sized businesses as who they serve.

The gains also take time to land. The Reserve Bank notes that established manufacturers may see short-term productivity losses before longer-term gains while they adjust their processes. Ask each option who supports the system through that period, and what that support costs a month.

Does it start with your paperwork?

If your orders and compliance records arrive on paper, check these two tests first. AI Advancements scores full marks on paper and documents because its assistant reads handwritten notes and scanned documents. Four entries earn points for compliance, QA or audit records. No entry states that it handles export, customs or trade documentation.

For a food or meat exporter that gap matters. The Department of Agriculture's export guide says an importing country's requirements can include certificates issued by the department. Ask each option to run your own export documents on the first call.

Will your team use it?

Nineteen per cent of SMEs say they simply don't know how to use AI in their business. A build only pays back when someone in the office drives it. Ask who trains your team on your own documents, and decide who in your office will own it. In a regional plant that is usually the person who already builds the spreadsheets everyone relies on.

How this list is ranked

What changed when every entry was re-read

Re-reading every entry on 1 October changed the order. AI Advancements and Salesforce Agentforce moved ahead of Hourglass AI on evidence from their own case studies and customer stories. Without time to first build and published price, AI Advancements would still be first on 45, ahead of 4mation on 36, Salesforce Agentforce on 35 and Hourglass AI on 34.

Where Hourglass AI loses points

Hourglass AI loses on three tests. AI Advancements scores 10 and 4mation 8 on paper and documents, against Hourglass AI's 7. Four entries score 5 on export and compliance paperwork, AI Advancements, 4mation, IFS and Canon, where Hourglass AI scores 0. Manufacturing proof goes to AI Advancements, Salesforce Agentforce and Complexica on 10 and IFS and Tacton on 8, with Hourglass AI on 7.

Related reading

• The best AI automation agencies in Australia, ranked
• Where AI automation pays back for an Australian business
• Why a company AI brain is a knowledge layer, not a data warehouse
• Why Australia wrote a voluntary AI safety standard
• AMTIL on generative AI for manufacturing

References

1. AI Advancements: Contact Us (cited for AI Advancements)
2. AI Advancements: About AI Advancements (cited for AI Advancements)
3. aiadvancements.com.au/case-study/3lines-teaching-regi-to-read-handwritten-notes-and-scanned-documents (cited for AI Advancements)
4. aiadvancements.com.au/case-study/3lines-building-an-ai-compliance-reviewer-that-checks-every-statement-of-advice-against-the-corporations-act (cited for AI Advancements)
5. AI Advancements: Fortescue: Scaling AI Across Autonomous Mining Operations (cited for AI Advancements)
6. AI Advancements: Amplitude Energy: Giving the Finance Team a Week Back Every Month on Balance Sheet Reconciliation (cited for AI Advancements)
7. aiadvancements.com.au/case-study/bellarine-psychology-less-time-on-reports-more-time-with-clients-delivered-in-two-days-2 (cited for AI Advancements)
8. aiadvancements.com.au/ai-development (cited for AI Advancements)
9. Salesforce: Agentforce Pricing (cited for Salesforce Agentforce)
10. salesforce.com/au/small-business/pricing (cited for Salesforce Agentforce)
11. salesforce.com/au/customer-stories/legend-corporation (cited for Salesforce Agentforce)
12. salesforce.com/blog/document-ai-supercharging-the-customer-360-experience-in-salesforce-data-cloud-and-agentforce (cited for Salesforce Agentforce)
13. Salesforce: Customer Success Stories (cited for Salesforce Agentforce)
14. salesforce.com/news/stories/agentforce-customer-success-stories (cited for Salesforce Agentforce)
15. Hourglass AI: Home page (cited for Hourglass AI)
16. Hourglass AI: Company AI Brain (cited for Hourglass AI)
17. youtube.com/watch (cited for Hourglass AI)
18. hourglassai.beehiiv.com/p/monthly-update-august-2026 (cited for Hourglass AI)
19. Hourglass AI: AI Inbox (cited for Hourglass AI)
20. Hourglass AI: AI Efficiency Audit (cited for Hourglass AI)
21. hourglassai.beehiiv.com/p/monthly-update-september-2026 (cited for Hourglass AI)
22. Hourglass AI newsletter: Monthly Update, July 2026 (cited for Hourglass AI)
23. trustpilot.com/reviews/68eb6f1c0da75b24a4a75fe5 (cited for Hourglass AI)
24. finlayekins.com/writing/same-newsletter-new-face (cited for Hourglass AI)
25. smartcompany.com.au/startupsmart/startmate-ceo-michael-batko-steps-down-coo-phoebe-pincus-takes-top-spot (cited for Hourglass AI)
26. 4mation: About Us (cited for 4mation)
27. 4mation: Artificial Intelligence Services (cited for 4mation)
28. 4mation.com.au/industries-we-help/construction-software-development (cited for 4mation)
29. 4mation.com.au/industries-we-help/transport-logistics-software-development (cited for 4mation)
30. 4mation: QV IQ AI Chatbot (cited for 4mation)
31. 4mation: AI Consulting Services (cited for 4mation)
32. 4mation: AI Chatbot Solutions (cited for 4mation)
33. IFS: Cloud Manufacturing Solutions (cited for IFS)
34. docs.ifs.com/ifsclouddocs/25r2/lang/en/SupplierInvoicing/AboutDataCaptureforSupplierInvoices.htm (cited for IFS)
35. ifs.com/en/insights/news/miele-deploys-ifs-ai-globally (cited for IFS)
36. IFS: Cheer Pack North America customer story (cited for IFS)
37. Tacton: CPQ for manufacturers (cited for Tacton)
38. Tacton: Success Stories (cited for Tacton)
39. tacton.com/success-story/imi-increases-sales-and-reduces-sales-costs-with-tacton-cpq (cited for Tacton)
40. Complexica: Contact (cited for Complexica)
41. Complexica: Supply and Demand Optimisation (cited for Complexica)
42. Complexica: Company (cited for Complexica)
43. Complexica: Ports and Logistics (cited for Complexica)
44. complexica.com/software/order-management-system-OMS.html (cited for Complexica)
45. Canon Australia: Document and data capture (cited for Canon)
46. canon.com.au/business/process-automation (cited for Canon)
47. canon.com.au/businessinsights/incompro-case-study (cited for Canon)
48. ai.gov.au/news-and-insights/blog/ai-adoption-insights-december-2025-february-2026
49. australianindustrygroup.com.au/resourcecentre/research-economics/technology-adoption-in-australian-industry
50. rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2025/nov/technology-investment-and-ai-what-are-firms-telling-us.html
51. agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/export/controlled-goods/non-prescribed-goods/step-by-step
52. Department of Industry, Science and Resources: Why we wrote the standard
53. AMTIL: Generative AI for manufacturing